Originally posted by Monkey_Julius_BoWaffle
Leaked albums are good for bands IMO. If the album is worth a shit, I notice the majority of people will go out and buy a real copy. I disagree that
it hurts the small bands - I think it helps them. I think it hurts the big acts because their fans are generally fly by nighters and their music is
more "hit single" oriented. People into underground music generally feel an obligation to support their favorite bands and like to collect the albums,
not just have a shitty burned CD copy.
Like the Ramallah for example - I've already turned some folks I wouldn't have assumed would have liked it onto it and they're asking me "when does
this come out, where can I get it"? I think in Ramallah's case, the leak was a DAMN good thing. I think it's going to make it sell better than it even
would have before.
Basically I look at it this way - free exposure. Small bands don't have to depend on labels money or media backing for exposure anymore. They can do
it right outta their bedrooms and make it into thousands of peoples homes for free. For every downloader that never buys the real CD, they probably
pick up 5 more that end up buying one that might not have before they got to preview the album.
As for the whole Metallica/Lars attitude - always remember, back in 1982, they would have BEGGED people to download their stuff for free. Any young
band is generally stoked just to have people actually checking their shit out and listening to it and commenting on it.
Also, in modern times, you almost HAVE to preview shit before you buy it. I mean, there are certain artists that you KNOW will deliver the goods
almost every time, but there are so many new artists and albums popping up all the time, it's impossible to know whats worthy and what is a total
waste. |